Before
ascending into heaven, Jesus gave the church a command to evangelize. In what
became known as the Great Commission Jesus told His disciples that all
authority had been given to Him and they were to “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the
name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to
observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the
end of the age.” (Matthew 28:19-20 ESV)
Clearly one
of the main responsibilities of the church is to share the gospel. Since each
individual congregation has limited resources, they have to make decisions
about how best to fulfill this commission to preach and teach. Recently, I have
had a number of conversations about missionary outreach and I am surprised by
how often I heard a particular opinion that I would like to address. In at
least three of these conversations, well-intentioned believers have told me
that they think that their churches should focus on doing missionary work in
their local communities. In each of these cases, it was pointed out that there
were many needs and many “unreached” people within a few miles of where their
church met. These brothers and sisters would prefer that the missionary
resources of their church be focused on those local needs rather than sent to
the other side of the world.
The desire
to see those near us turn to Christ is certainly God honoring. It is also a
good thing for us to wish to help meet the needs of those in our own
communities, particularly when the needs (both spiritual and physical) in those
communities are so great as they are in American cities. The idea that we
should focus our attention on the “unreached” people in our own communities,
however, fails to make an important distinction. It is true that there are many
unconverted people in our communities but it is generally not true that they
are unreached. We have to be careful that we do not fail to understand the
difference between those that are unconverted and those who are unreached.
In most
places in the United States, there are plenty of opportunities for anyone who
is interested to find a church, attend a Bible study, or get a Bible of their
own. While many people in our country reject the gospel it is typically not
because they lack access to people or resources where they can learn about it. In
many places in the world, this is not the case. According to The JoshuaProject, there are still an estimated 2.8 billion people that are completely
unreached. This means that they live in places where they do not have any
access to Bibles, there are no indigenous believers, and they are likely to die
without ever hearing the gospel even once.
The local
mission of the church is of great importance. We should have a burden for those
around us to accept the Gospel and be saved. The spiritual needs in our
communities are very great and I do not want to minimize that. Even so, we have
to avoid a provincial attitude where we retreat into our own communities and
ignore our responsibility to the broader mission of the Church. There remain
places where there is no translation of the Bible to read, no preacher to hear,
and no believers to share their hope. We must not be indifferent to these needs,
Jesus commands otherwise.
If you are
interested in thinking about this further, I suggest you listen to the
following sermon delivered by Pastor David Platt earlier this year at the T4G
conference. Pastor Platt explains how a belief in God’s sovereignty fuels a
death defying passion for missions. He highlights the distinction between the
unconverted and the unreached and gives a memorable exhortation to the Church
to share the gospel with the unreached.
No comments:
Post a Comment